Re: URL Spec WorkMode

On 12/02/2014 04:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [offlist]

Oopsie.  Note to self: double check cc list before sending emails.

In any case, the suggestion for pull requests applies to everyone.

- Sam Ruby

> I notice that you are on GitHub.  One thing I encourage you to do is to
> directly edit:
>
> https://github.com/webspecs/url/blob/develop/docs/workmode.md
>
> Expand the proposal, fix mistakes, correct typos -- everything is fair
> game.
>
> This will result in pull requests, but pretty much anything that doesn't
> unnecessarily cause somebody to come unglued I'll take.
>
> The same thing is true for the working draft:
>
> https://github.com/w3ctag/url/tree/develop
>
> Change the copyright, status, metadata at the top of url.bs.  Heck, if
> you feel so inclined, change the spec itself.
>
> I'm making the same suggestion to Wendy.  I'd love for the end result to
> be a truly joint proposal.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> On 12/02/2014 10:28 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
>>> TL;DR: The administrative hold-ups are now all my fault, so I'm sorry
>>> if they persist, and I will start working to remove them...
>>
>> Thanks in advance for helping clear administrative obstacles!
>>
>>> (other stuff later)
>>>
>>> 02.12.2014, 15:57, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>>
>>>> What is the hold-up for publishing a Public Working Draft?
>>>
>>> It has been that the chairs have been pretty busy, and we dropped the
>>> ball between us. More recently, we sorted that out so the hold up is
>>> now me.
>>
>> For discussion purposes:
>>
>> https://rawgit.com/w3ctag/url/develop/url.html
>>
>>>>   Can I ask that you respond to the following email?
>>>
>>> Yes. That's a very fair request. I may be able to do so tonight…
>>>
>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0315.html
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what I need to do.
>>>>>   Webapps still generally works under the 2005 version of the
>>>>> Process -
>>>>>   but we could change this document to the 2014 process. The only
>>>>>   really noticeable difference will be that there is formally no "Last
>>>>>   Call", and the final Patent Exclusion opportunity is instead for the
>>>>>   draft published as Candidate Recommendation. (In other words, you
>>>>>   need to be pretty bureaucratically-minded to notice a difference).
>>>>
>>>> Lets update to 2014 now.  Its only a matter of time before not updating
>>>> won't be an option any more.
>>>
>>> Works for me. I'll start a Call for Consensus - but I imagine it will
>>> be a formality.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Chaals
>>>
>>> --
>>> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>>> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:45:19 UTC