- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:44:54 -0500
- To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 12/02/2014 04:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > [offlist] Oopsie. Note to self: double check cc list before sending emails. In any case, the suggestion for pull requests applies to everyone. - Sam Ruby > I notice that you are on GitHub. One thing I encourage you to do is to > directly edit: > > https://github.com/webspecs/url/blob/develop/docs/workmode.md > > Expand the proposal, fix mistakes, correct typos -- everything is fair > game. > > This will result in pull requests, but pretty much anything that doesn't > unnecessarily cause somebody to come unglued I'll take. > > The same thing is true for the working draft: > > https://github.com/w3ctag/url/tree/develop > > Change the copyright, status, metadata at the top of url.bs. Heck, if > you feel so inclined, change the spec itself. > > I'm making the same suggestion to Wendy. I'd love for the end result to > be a truly joint proposal. > > - Sam Ruby > > On 12/02/2014 10:28 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: >>> TL;DR: The administrative hold-ups are now all my fault, so I'm sorry >>> if they persist, and I will start working to remove them... >> >> Thanks in advance for helping clear administrative obstacles! >> >>> (other stuff later) >>> >>> 02.12.2014, 15:57, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>: >>> >>>> What is the hold-up for publishing a Public Working Draft? >>> >>> It has been that the chairs have been pretty busy, and we dropped the >>> ball between us. More recently, we sorted that out so the hold up is >>> now me. >> >> For discussion purposes: >> >> https://rawgit.com/w3ctag/url/develop/url.html >> >>>> Can I ask that you respond to the following email? >>> >>> Yes. That's a very fair request. I may be able to do so tonight… >>> >>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0315.html >>>> >>>> Let me know what I need to do. >>>>> Webapps still generally works under the 2005 version of the >>>>> Process - >>>>> but we could change this document to the 2014 process. The only >>>>> really noticeable difference will be that there is formally no "Last >>>>> Call", and the final Patent Exclusion opportunity is instead for the >>>>> draft published as Candidate Recommendation. (In other words, you >>>>> need to be pretty bureaucratically-minded to notice a difference). >>>> >>>> Lets update to 2014 now. Its only a matter of time before not updating >>>> won't be an option any more. >>> >>> Works for me. I'll start a Call for Consensus - but I imagine it will >>> be a formality. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Chaals >>> >>> -- >>> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex >>> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:45:19 UTC