- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:34:04 -0500
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/7/14 12:57 PM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > 07.11.2014, 17:53, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>: >> On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html >>>> It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/ >>> That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not. >>> Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests? >> I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note. >>> I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate. >> It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the >> currently-maintained draft. > Yeah, the point is that we are not maintaining a draft and WHAT-WG are. OK, so I just checked in a patch that sets the Latest Editor's Draft points to Anne's document <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html>.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 18:34:34 UTC