On 22 October 2014 11:02, John Mellor <johnme@google.com> wrote: > a restricted form of push where each push event fired on the SW must trigger > user-visible UI. How would that work? Is the idea that there would be a default notification that the SW could alter the contents of (perhaps), but not prevent or indefinitely delay? I'm not convinced of the virtue of something like that. It attaches a specific kind of penalty to the use of push that might discourage its use, but I'm not sure that it creates the right sort of disincentive. I tend to agree with Jonas' view on the separation of the two permissions; this suggests a very particular coupling that seems a little unnatural. Can you expand on the reasoning behind the decision?Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 03:23:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:32 UTC