- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:23:31 -0700
- To: John Mellor <johnme@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 22 October 2014 11:02, John Mellor <johnme@google.com> wrote: > a restricted form of push where each push event fired on the SW must trigger > user-visible UI. How would that work? Is the idea that there would be a default notification that the SW could alter the contents of (perhaps), but not prevent or indefinitely delay? I'm not convinced of the virtue of something like that. It attaches a specific kind of penalty to the use of push that might discourage its use, but I'm not sure that it creates the right sort of disincentive. I tend to agree with Jonas' view on the separation of the two permissions; this suggests a very particular coupling that seems a little unnatural. Can you expand on the reasoning behind the decision?
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 03:23:59 UTC