W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: [xhr] Questions on the future of the XHR spec, W3C snapshot

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:05:05 -0400
Message-ID: <54432A61.8090208@mit.edu>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 10/17/14, 8:19 PM, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
> a) Ship a TR based on the spec just *before* the big Fetch refactoring.

If we want to publish something at all, I think this is the most 
reasonable option, frankly.  I have no strong opinions on whether this 
is done REC-track or as a Note, I think, but I think such a document 
would in fact be useful to have if it doesn't exist yet.

> b) Ship a TR based on the newest WHATWG version, also snapshot and ship the "Fetch" spec to pretend there's something stable to refer to.

I think this requires more pretending thatn I'm comfortable with for 
Fetch.  ;)

> c) Ship a TR based on the newest WHATWG version, reference WHATWG's Fetch spec throughout.

There doesn't seem to be much point to this from my point of view, since 
all the interesting bits are in Fetch.

Received on Sunday, 19 October 2014 03:05:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:31 UTC