W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

RE: [Push] one or many

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:10:54 +0000
To: "'Michael van Ouwerkerk'" <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C351F6ADE62@CAFRFD1MSGUSRIA.ITServices.sbc.com>
This is one of those semantics rabbit-holes that I request we avoid. The term webapp is well-known (>5m hits on google in the common forms “webapp” “web app”, etc).
In comparison, “web page” is probably a more amorphous and anachronistic term and provides less valuable context for the user/developer of specs. The web is a distributed application framework. In “modern” terms it serves apps that are implemented using web tech (the essential meaning of “webapp”).

Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Michael van Ouwerkerk [mailto:mvanouwerkerk@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 11:58 AM
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Brian Kardell; public-webapps@w3c.org
Subject: Re: [Push] one or many

I filed an issue regarding the term webapp:


On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com<mailto:mvanouwerkerk@google.com>> wrote:
Indeed, the spec is currently inconsistent about registrations. The current intention is to have one per ServiceWorkerRegistration (i.e. per service worker). See for more details and discussion:

The term webapp does seem a bit odd to me. It's really just a web page. Is there a reusable concept I can link to for that?


On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl<mailto:annevk@annevk.nl>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com<mailto:bkardell@gmail.com>> wrote:
> They do define it in the spec at least[1], but I don't see how it can
> mean both things.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/push-api/#dfn-webapp

That's not a definition that means anything. As I said, it's not grounded.


Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 20:11:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:31 UTC