- From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk73@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:36:24 +0900
- To: ¼ÛÁ¤±â <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Christophe Dumez <ch.dumez@samsung.com>, Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKmBCi2GhVDXiRyC_M5hkDAncVbjyBCrNLnhTvy4S4mJaOh9sg@mail.gmail.com>
Jungkee! Thanks a lot! Mahesh, could you update task scheduler API spec using service worker for system event part of the spec? Jungkee, could you help Mahesh for doing this efficiently? It would be great if we could publish updated working draft before TPAC. Thanks in advance! Kr, Wonsuk. 2014. 10. 8. ¿ÀÈÄ 8:03¿¡ "¼ÛÁ¤±â" <jungkee.song@samsung.com>´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º: > Hi, > > > > I just updated the extensibility section [1] of Service Workers spec [2] > which specifies the ways to define an API bound to a service worker > registration, to define its own functional events extending ExtendableEvent > interface and to request firing the functional events to a service worker. > > > > It still has related issues and further work, but I intended to expose the > guide to other spec editors sooner to collaborate on. Please file bugs or > leave your questions at github issue tracker [3]. > > > > [1] > https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/index.html#extensibility > > [2] https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/ > > [3] https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues > > > > Thanks, > > Jungkee > > > > > > ------- *Original Message* ------- > > *Sender* : ¼ÛÁ¤±â<jungkee.song@samsung.com> S5(Ã¥ÀÓ)/Ã¥ÀÓ/Web°³¹ß±×·ì(¹«¼±)/»ï¼ºÀüÀÚ > > *Date* : 2014-09-30 14:14 (GMT+09:00) > > *Title* : Re: Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec > > > > Apologies for the late reply and not having updated the extension section > yet. > > The ServiceWorkerRegistration [1] interface and the ExtendableEvent > [2] interface are the interfaces to be extended by Task scheduler API. They > are now defined in the spec, but the extension guide is still missing. I'll > update the status next week. > > > > Thanks, > > Jungkee > > > > [1] > https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/index.html#service-worker-registration-interface > > [2] > https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/index.html#extendable-event > > > > ------- *Original Message* ------- > > *Sender* : Wonsuk Lee<wonsuk73@gmail.com> > > *Date* : 2014-09-30 12:48 (GMT+09:00) > > *Title* : Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec > > > > Hi. Jungkee! > Could you update the status for below email? I would like to bring task > schedule API to LCWD as far as we can! ;-) Thanks in advance! > > Kr, Wonsuk. > 2014. 8. 12. ¿ÀÈÄ 5:29¿¡ "Wonsuk Lee" <wonsuk73@gmail.com>´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º: > >> Jungkee. >> Do you have any update on your work for ServiceWorker? It would be >> excellent if task scheduler spec can go to next step with >> ServiceWorkerRegistration interface soon! >> >> Kr, Wonsuk. >> >> >> 2014-07-22 13:53 GMT+09:00 Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>: >> >>> On Jun 27, 2014 2:38 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > On June 26, 2014 at 1:32:13 PM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote: >>> > > Hi. Chris and Marcos. >>> > > Thanks for quick reply! >>> > > >>> > > When is proper timing to integrate task scheduler spec with >>> ServiceWorker? >>> > > We already have FPWD for ServiceWorker. Is not enough to do >>> integration >>> > > work? >>> > >>> > Never too late to start thinking about how to do it. Problem is that >>> the underlying architecture for SW is unstable and unproven so the "right >>> way" too hook in ScheduleTasks is still a bit unclear. >>> > >>> >>> It seems this design has got a consensus: >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0081.html >>> >>> I think I'll be able to get back with a section for the extension guide >>> in the ServiceWorker spec in a few weeks. >>> >>> Note that ServiceWorkerRegistration interface in the sited discussion >>> has not been added in the spec yet. >>> >>> > -- >>> > Marcos Caceres >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ========================================= >> ÀÌ ¿ø ¼® (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D >> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (ß²àøï³í) >> Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997 >> E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com >> http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73 >> ----------------------------------------- >> Inspire the World, Create the Future !!! >> ========================================= >> > > -- > Jungkee Song > Samsung Electronics > > > > > -- > Jungkee Song > Samsung Electronics > > > >
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 201410082000461_XOK0LK7C.gif
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 13:36:55 UTC