- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:36:24 +0200
- To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote: > Last I checked, animation frame task was still underdefined. This is > what you can read in the WHATWG's fullscreen specification: > "Animation frame task is not really defined yet, including relative > order within that task, see bug 26440." At least that indicates what is expected of user agents, roughly, instead of steering them in a different direction that is known to be wrong. > Also, I'm not entirely sure why Anne is so loudly complaining about that > issue. The issue was not closed or waived but postponed until we can > properly hooked to the thing. As you can tell from my initial email in this thread, I complained about that. > LC doesn't freeze the specification and we > could definitely get this fixed before moving to CR. Since when can you change normative requirements and just move on? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:36:52 UTC