W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

RE: User Intentions Explainer (was: List of Intentions)

From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:58:21 +0000
To: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>
CC: "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, Julie Parent <jparent@gmail.com>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <85c35238145f4d8491d95adfc98094e5@BLUPR03MB437.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I think what I'm hearing in this conversation about the shape of a new contentEditable is really that a simple "minimal" is not going to work. Instead, having something like a delimited list will satisfy more people. See the bug on GitHub [1] for more details.


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Frederico Knabben <f.knabben@cksource.com>
> wrote:
> <snip>
>> IMHO, the following are the "minimal" features that it should provide:
>> - Selection: UI (e.g. caret), creation (e.g. mouse) and modifications
>> (e.g. arrows)
>> - Focus (probably part of Selection, but it's so hard to make it right
>> that I'm listing it here to not stay forgotten)
>> - Input Text (typing)
>> - Insert New Line
>> - Delete / Backspace
> If we include deletion/backspace and input text, that will then also mean
> merging of paragraphs (and other nodes) when the caret is at the beginning
> of a second paragraph and the backspace key is being hit? Last I checked
> that was broken for example in Safari/Chrome (converting the HTML inside the
> two merged paragraphs from <span style=""> into a mix of <font>-tags and
> other outdated things).
> To me it's fine if inputting text/backspace is being included, as long as
> browser makers believe they will have the time and resources to fix the
> actual text editing part. That to me seems to be the most broken thing about
> the whole thing currently.
> If they on the other hand say they have no time for any of this (as not
> having fixed bugs in this area for some years might indicate) I would be OK
> with them leaving the input/deletion/undo history part out.
> --
> Johannes Wilm
> Fidus Writer
> http://www.fiduswriter.org
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 20:58:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:26 UTC