- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:50:36 +1000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "public-webapps" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, at 08:28, Jonas Sicking wrote: > I think it's likely to result in many implementation bugs if we rely > on this being defined buried inside an algorithm rather than at least > mentioned at the definition of the property. I think it's good feedback. I could probably make this more visible. Would you mind opening an issue marked as "Enhancement" and may go with a proposal of what you believe would be easier to find. I don't want to have you do the editor work but given that the problem isn't that the information is missing but that it is not well exposed, fresh eyes would be better to help with that ;) -- Mounir
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:51:02 UTC