- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:58:45 +0200
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 2014-09-11 17:19, Marcos Caceres wrote: > ... > 5. What indicators (e.g., the big red box) will be put into the spec to > indicate that the WHATWG version is the canonical version? > ... It's my understanding that the intent is to actually make technical changes, as indicated in: > This specification documents current RFC 3986 and RFC 3987 handling in contemporary Web browser implementations. As a consequence, this specification is not compatible with those RFCs. It is published for the purpose of providing a stable reference for the HTML5 specification and reflecting current Web browser HTML5 implementations. The W3C Technical Architecture Group expects to continue the work on the URL specification and produce a future version that will attempt to re-align the URL specification with an updated version of RFC 3986 while preserving interoperability. In which case the WHATWG version wouldn't be "canonical" anymore anyway. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 15:59:21 UTC