Re: publishing new WD of URL spec from James Robinson on 2014-09-10 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:27:51 -0700
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAD73mdKY50vfz8ogY9wv8tk_wa=AsaTeEYxrLP1nPYCZURzzHg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> WHATWG specs are not legitimate for reference by W3C specs.
>

Do you have a citation to back up this claim?

> Their IPR status is indeterminate and they do not follow a consensus
> process.
>

Do you have citations for where this is listed as part of the requirements
for references in W3C specifications?

I know these are your personal opinions but am not aware of anything that
states this is W3C process.

- James

Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 22:28:18 UTC