- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:06:38 +0200
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- CC: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, "adelespinasse@gmail.com" <adelespinasse@gmail.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Le 12/08/2014 19:44, Domenic Denicola a écrit : > Realizing the difference between these is important background to realizing why async + sugar cannot replace synchronous code. (Apologies if this was stating the obvious...) Is replacing sync APIs a goal? It sure isn't mine. My point is that from a purely technical perspective async is better as it allows better reuse of process/threads. Historically async programming has been hard to read/write. Things are getting better as programming languages evolve (ES7) is all I'm saying. David
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 18:07:12 UTC