W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

[Bug 26365] New: [Shadow]: Need an evquivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:13:53 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-26365-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

            Bug ID: 26365
           Summary: [Shadow]: Need an evquivalent definition of 'in a
                    Document' for shadow trees
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Component Model
          Assignee: dglazkov@chromium.org
          Reporter: hayato@chromium.org
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
            Blocks: 14978

The context is:

https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=393350
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=394327

According to the current definition of a 'in a Document' [1], some important
features, such as scripting, should not work in shadow trees as per the spec.

[1]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-preview/infrastructure.html#in-a-document


Because I am afraid that it's not a good idea to change the definition of 'in a
Document', we need a better terminology for alternative of 'in a Document',
such as 'in a Document or in a shadow tree', and should fix the relevant specs
by using that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 04:13:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:26 UTC