Re: WebIDL Spec Status

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, at 10:45, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Marcos <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote:
> > Even if we were able to take the V1 bits to Rec (a lot of which is now
> > obsolete), the V2 stuff is already widely supported and heavily relied on
> > by browser vendors. IMO, it's a waste of everyone's time to try to maintain
> > multiple versions.
> >
> 
> I agree that the V1 CR should be abandoned or replaced with a completed
> snapshot of V2. Though it would be useful to ask a wider community about
> the value of moving some flavor of V1 to REC.

What's the benefits from having a REC based on v1 even if we know it is
already obsolete?

-- Mounir

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 10:11:51 UTC