W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input (was: contentEditable=minimal)

From: Julie Parent <jparent@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:50:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF42kzEL1sH4JUncR6E8wPzK6hLOPfq517zJVWKFS9g8Ot2STg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Yoshifumi Inoue <yosin@chromium.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Piotr KoszuliƄski <p.koszulinski@cksource.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Without default text input, the current proposal for
contentEditable="minimal" is essentially just enabling cursors (drawing
them, dispatching events, performing default actions).  Rather than calling
the mode "minimal", which is ill-defined, why not explicitly call it what
it is: "cursor-only"?  Or, have contentEditable take a list of features to
turn enable: contentEditable="enable-cursors enable-CommandEvents".

Or, rather than tying this concept to contentEditable, with all the
assumptions and complications that brings up, why not expose this building
block as a completely separate attribute?

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Yoshifumi Inoue <yosin@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > Range.style is cool idea! I assume Range.detach() removes styles added
> > Range.style.
> detach() is a no-op. http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-range-detach
> > To implement text composition with this, I would like to have "wave
> > underline", "dotted underline", "thick underline" etc.
> Range.prototype.style seems complex in the context of overlapping
> ranges and such. Suddenly you're no longer applying CSS to a tree.
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 22:50:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:24 UTC