- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 01:22:01 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- Cc: chairs@w3.org, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
I've provided this input through a few channels already, but I don't think the user of [SetClass] here is good (and in fact I've been arguing that SetClass should be removed from WebIDL). First off you likely don't want to key the list of fonts on the FontFace object instance like the spec currently does. What it looks like you want here is a simple enumerable list of FontFace objects which are currently available to the document. Second, subclassing the ES6 Set class should mean that the following two calls are equivalent: Set.prototype.add.call(myFontFaceSet, someFontFace); myFontFaceSet.add(someFontFace); However I don't think the former would cause the rendering of the document to change in, whereas the latter would. Hence I would strongly recommend coming up with a different solution than using SetClass. Separately, FontFace.loaded seems to fulfill the same purpose as FontFaceSet.ready(). I.e. both indicate that the object is done loading/parsing/applying its data. It seems more consistent if they had the same name, and if both were either an attribute or both were a function. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2014 08:22:59 UTC