RE: Progress on Push API

Hi Chaals, all,

It was not intended to be an official W3C meeting, but just an informal discussion to feed the official standardization track, which AFAIK this mailing list is part of. As you may note my previous email was not imposing any agreement to the group but just proposing a set of changes and asking from feedback from other parties. But sorry if my email has led to any misunderstanding.


On 29 abr 2014 at 15:42:40, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> Hi Eduardo, all,
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:00:15 +0200, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <>
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Last week the Push API editors (AT&T, Telefónica) and other interested
>> parties (Mozilla, Google) met to progress this specification.
> Just a gentle reminder that if you are having a meeting there needs to be
> an announcement of it. I don't want to stop people doing work - obviously,
> we encourage that happening and applaud members who take initiative to get
> things done.
> But there is a process requirement, that you and your employer agreed to
> when joining the group. It isn't just a quid pro quo for the rest of us
> agreeing to go through a PAG if necessary. It is also based on an
> important legal requirement that standards be developed according to a
> fair process, to avoid being construed as engaging in anti-competitive or
> cartel behaviour.
> And of course it is good manners.
> As a quick reminder, the general notice times required are 1 week for a
> "distributed" telephone meeting (unless it is a regularly scheduled
> meeting) and 8 weeks for a physical meeting.
> If you want to organise a meeting for a particular topic the chairs and
> staff contacts will be very happy to help, both to make sure we meet the
> process requirements and with any necessary logistics. The notice period
> is the only one likely to have any real impact, and there is a way to
> approve shorter notice if it is really necessary.
> But I would ask people who want to organise a get-together that they
> provide the notice required by the Process, to ensure that "interested
> parties" in the working group have a fair opportunity to attend.
> cheers
> Chaals


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 14:03:15 UTC