- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:01:11 -0500
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 12/12/13 7:31 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:42:15 +0100, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> The first Call for workers Test Results was sent over a half-year ago >> and another one a few weeks before WebApps' Shenzhen meeting. Despite >> those requests, the workers implementation report [IR] remains empty. >> >> Simon - would you please add results for Presto? > > Done. Great and thanks (and thanks to Travis too for the IE results)! > First I ran the tests using > https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/test-runner/src on a local server, but > then I couldn't think of a straight-forward way to put the results in > the wiki so I just ran the tests manually, too. :-( Since most tests > are automated it's silly to run them manually and edit a wiki page. Is > there a better way? Re automated running, there is <http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite> but I think it is considered obsolete (and isn't maintained). Test automation is/was on Tobie's ToDo list. I'll followup separately about the status on public-test-infra. (Re using a wiki for the implementation report, to produce the Web Messaging and Web Sockets implementation reports, I created a script that merges tests results from individual runs and outputs the wiki table syntax.) > I also found a bug in a test > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 > > (Actually there were several tests with bugs but I didn't investigate > further.) It would be useful to include that info in the Comments column. Would you please do that or give me the list of tests with bugs so I can add that info? (I suppose the test bugs info should also be on GH.) -Thanks, ArtB
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 13:10:27 UTC