- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:59:14 +0100
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On 2013-12-11 13:13, Mounir Lamouri wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013, at 14:48, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> Would any potential implementer consider supporting a HTTP based solution >> to loading manifests? > > It seems quite premature to discuss a HTTP based solution to advertise a > manifest. Even if it happens to be something developers ask for, we will > anyway need to provide a <link> solution. It seems that the best course > of actions we could take here is to implement the manifest feature using > <link> and gather developer feedback to evaluate that alternative. If you define a way using <link>, the alternative approach using the Link: header field essentially comes for free. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 12:59:44 UTC