- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:06:00 -0500
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 12/3/13 11:46 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > I don't have any objections to waiting for the folks to catch up. > We'll just keep it in LC until next year. Given the feedback on this thread, I don't think we have broad consensus to move Custom Elements to CR so I support Dimitri's proposal. Jonas, Ryosuke - if you haven't already done so, please file related bugs so we can track the issues you see with this spec (as well as any of the other Web Components spec). -Thanks, ArtB > > :DG< > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com > <mailto:rniwa@apple.com>> wrote: > > We share the same concern Jonas raised here. > > In addition, we had been postponing reviewing the Web Components > specifications > due to the "heavy" refactoring of the Shadow DOM specification > announced in July: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JulSep/0161.html > > Now we know that there has been an effort to decouple the various > Web Components > features and specifications, and the Custom Elements specification > was going to > the Last Call on its own. > > Unfortunately, we didn't know about this until fairly recently, > which is why our > thorough review of these specifications did not happen until > mid-September > (by which time this spec had already reached the Last Call). > > We worked really hard to write up our feedback on the cross-origin > use case before > the Last Call deadline so that our feedback could be addressed > before the spec hits CR. > > We still don't feel that moving the Custom Elements specification > into CR now, on its own, > is a good idea given that many of the most important use cases for > Custom Elements > naturally involve features in other Web Components specifications, > such as Shadow DOM. > > - R. Niwa > > On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc > <mailto:jonas@sicking.cc>> wrote: > >> I don't know how Apple feels, but I still don't feel like we at >> Mozilla has had the ability to do a thorough enough review of the >> spec >> to say that it's ready for CR. I believe both Mozilla and Apple >> raised >> this concern when we went into LC. >> >> / Jonas >
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 12:10:19 UTC