Re: [ime-api] Seeking status and plans

Hi Arthur,

Thanks for the coordination.
The status of IME API in the PubStatus page is correct.

I will make some modification to Editor's draft soon, taking some of what
Microsoft proposed [1],
and some clarification about event delivery.
If possible, I hope we can get live feedback on the TPAC session.

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/proposals/IMEProposal.html


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> Hi Takayoshi and Kenji,
>
> If any of the data for the IME spec in [PubStatus] is not accurate, please
> provide corrections.
>
> Also, if you have any new information re your plans for the spec, or the
> spec's status with respect to being feature complete, implementation
> status, etc. please let us know.
>
> -Thanks, ArtB
>
> [PubStatus] <http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/wiki/PubStatus<http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>
> >
>



-- 
Takayoshi Kochi