Re: Reminder of WebApps' off-list topic policy [Was: ...]

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Arthur Barstow <> wrote:
> On 10/2/13 12:51 PM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I wrote all the text in on which
>> appears to be based (although
>> woefully out of date). Given the W3C's explicit stance on forking, I
>> think would be hypocritical for your group to continue publishing this
>> fork.
> I appreciate you technical input on WebApps' specs and I would like that to
> continue. I would also be delighted if/when you and the W3C work out a
> mutually agreeable copyright policy for Working Group specs.
> WebApps' charter has a clear set of deliverables and a clear document
> license for these specs. Until there is consensus within the group to stop
> work on a spec or the charter is changed (e.g. to a different set of
> deliverables, different document license, etc.), the expectation is the
> group will continue to work on XHR, Fullscreen, and every other spec in our
> charter using W3C Document License.
> WebApps also has an "off-topic policy" [Off-Topic] I think you violate when
> you continue to discuss W3C's document license on WebApps' mail list. Please
> respect this policy and move all discussions related to W3C document license
> to the Revising W3C Process Community Group [w3process].

Could you please explain how your reply relates to my comment? I'm not
sure I'm following. In particular, I was not commenting on anything
related to copyright.

> [Off-topic]
> <>
> [w3process] <>


Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 11:49:15 UTC