- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:48:47 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > On 10/2/13 12:51 PM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I wrote all the text in http://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/ on which >> http://www.w3.org/TR/fullscreen/ appears to be based (although >> woefully out of date). Given the W3C's explicit stance on forking, I >> think would be hypocritical for your group to continue publishing this >> fork. > > I appreciate you technical input on WebApps' specs and I would like that to > continue. I would also be delighted if/when you and the W3C work out a > mutually agreeable copyright policy for Working Group specs. > > WebApps' charter has a clear set of deliverables and a clear document > license for these specs. Until there is consensus within the group to stop > work on a spec or the charter is changed (e.g. to a different set of > deliverables, different document license, etc.), the expectation is the > group will continue to work on XHR, Fullscreen, and every other spec in our > charter using W3C Document License. > > WebApps also has an "off-topic policy" [Off-Topic] I think you violate when > you continue to discuss W3C's document license on WebApps' mail list. Please > respect this policy and move all discussions related to W3C document license > to the Revising W3C Process Community Group [w3process]. Could you please explain how your reply relates to my comment? I'm not sure I'm following. In particular, I was not commenting on anything related to copyright. > [Off-topic] > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/WorkMode#Off-Topic_Discussion_Policy> > [w3process] <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/> -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 11:49:15 UTC