Re: blob URIs and the query string

Ok, I was asking for a use case like the use you show, I didn't think about
iframes :-) It's good to me then.
El 02/10/2013 07:37, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com> escribió:

> Oh, sure.  I'm not saying we should drop the query string entirely, I'm
> saying that blob:foo and blob:foo?bar should both load the same thing.  If
> someone does <iframe src="blob:foo?bar"> and the script inside that blob
> looks at bar and does processing on it that's fine.
>
> - Kyle
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Query can also be procesed by client-side javascript...
>> El 02/10/2013 07:25, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com> escribió:
>>
>> Well the query string is meant for the server, so what would you do with
>>> it?
>>>
>>> - Kyle
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could it be procesed someway instead?
>>>> El 02/10/2013 03:34, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> The File API specifies how to deal with fragment identifiers.  It
>>>>> should also specify what to do with the query string.  Presumably it should
>>>>> be ignored when looking up blob URIs.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Kyle
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>