- From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:37:00 +0800
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 05:37:27 UTC
Oh, sure. I'm not saying we should drop the query string entirely, I'm saying that blob:foo and blob:foo?bar should both load the same thing. If someone does <iframe src="blob:foo?bar"> and the script inside that blob looks at bar and does processing on it that's fine. - Kyle On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com> wrote: > Query can also be procesed by client-side javascript... > El 02/10/2013 07:25, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com> escribió: > > Well the query string is meant for the server, so what would you do with >> it? >> >> - Kyle >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Could it be procesed someway instead? >>> El 02/10/2013 03:34, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com> escribió: >>> >>> The File API specifies how to deal with fragment identifiers. It should >>>> also specify what to do with the query string. Presumably it should be >>>> ignored when looking up blob URIs. >>>> >>>> - Kyle >>>> >>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 05:37:27 UTC