W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [clipboard] typo in WebIDL

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:37:56 +0100
To: Hallvord Steen <hsteen@mozilla.com>
Cc: James Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@hazael-massieux.fr>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <B5C4087A67E4416585F9E7B3B69C1AB1@marcosc.com>

On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 20:31, Hallvord Steen wrote:

> > So does this imply that someone (i.e. Hallvord :)) needs to move it
> > elsewhere?
> Nah, it just means I should be more stringent on pushing out releases and go through the TR process (painful or not) so that the thingy with /TR/ in the URL is as up-to-date as possible. For a spec like clipboard events, which is not changing very much, it should be doable to get it to TR if I find just a little bit more time to polish it.
Ha! If I had a dollar for… just put it GitHub so then you don't need to be the only person polishing it :) If people care about the spec, then they can just send you PRs.    
> For a spec like, say, HTML5, Anne is right that the /TR/ version can be out of date compared to the apparently ever changing editor's draft. For list discussions, editor's draft is a good reference because that's the document that is being changed.
> Hope that clears up the confusion :)

It won't, as people are still going to end up at the wrong version.  
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 19:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:13 UTC