On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On IRC Domenic pointed out that the primary apparent usage for this mirrors > jQuery's .is(). Barring the caching case, it seems unlikely to be appealing > to do (new Selectors("div")).matches(el) instead of el.matches("div"). Thanks for bringing that up here Robin. I added Element.prototype.matches() to the specification: http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-element-matches See http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20130912#l-365 for why it does not have the refNodes argument anymore. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 12 September 2013 12:46:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:13 UTC