Re: File API - Progress - Question about Partial Blob data

On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> I think you might have misunderstood my initial comment.
> 
> I agree that the current partial data solution is not good. I think we
> should remove it.
> 


I'd really like other implementors to weigh in before we remove Partial Blob Data.  Cc'ing folks who helped with it.


> I think we should instead create a better solution in v2 of the API
> which is based on something other than FileReader and which has the
> ability to deliver data on the form of "here's the data that was
> loaded since last notification".


I agree that we should do a better way.

-- A*

Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 15:36:07 UTC