- From: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:10:07 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFpjS_0EzaT9Huzr29pQ4+RDKHfjH2NBHm51JVVMtgLJ9xBAZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yeah, it'd be great that we could move parts of the Shadow DOM spec into DOM. I guess that won't happen soon, but that should be be our long time goal after the refactoring. That is on my radar. Let me be conscious that refactored style closely will match that of the DOM in the refactoring. On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: > > I would like to announce that the editor's draft of the Shadow DOM spec > > ( > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html) > > is now under heavy refactoring. > > > > The goal of the refactoring is to make the spec healthy, including the > > followings: > > > > - Use more formal definitions and notations. > > - Make sure that the model and data structures, accompanying algorithms > are > > clearly defined. > > - Make the spec more compact. > > > > P.S. You can also see the original refactoring plan, which might be > > obsolete, but some of the parts are still useful to know the goal of the > > refactoring. > > ( > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iuf2DgzwKfMTscAX_xsymO73NmZ4NVYvfyFgUU4YINo/edit?usp=sharing > ) > > This sounds great. I'm not sure if this is still on your radar, but I > think eventually we want to move parts of this specification into DOM, > correct? So that the whole object model is defined somewhat coherently > in a single place. It would be good if the refactored style more > closely matched that of the DOM to make the integration go smoother > down the line. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- Hayato
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 04:10:54 UTC