On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, John J Barton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > >> I don't see why. Just have a wiki page that people can list their verbs on > >> and then point to their documentation. > > > > I agree here. The "standard" is sufficient for stewardship. > > Why won't I create a bot that fills with wiki with a dictionary's worth > of verbs point to my important intent: making money on advertising? My > own personal single-point of control. Oh, you think your bot is faster > than mine? We'll see about that! Oh, the wiki domain owners stepped in? > Set up a committee to approve changes? Censorship! Politics! Slowness! Changing the wiki would do nothing here, it's just documentation, and does not affect the implementations. So this is a non-issue. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 19:49:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:24 UTC