- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:17:43 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > PLH says that ideally every spec ends as a WG Note or a Recommendation > > but in practice groups need to consider other factors. In the case of > > the Landscape doc, which was by definition (or at least by title) > > transient, so let's just drop it (and not publish it as a WG Note). > Agreed. > > So, the proposal for the Landscape doc is amended: the proposal is to > > formally stop working on the Landscape document and to move it to > > PubStatus' "Specs NO Longer Active" table: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Specs_NO_Longer_Active > > > > If anyone objects to that, please reply by September 23 and understand > > that it would mean that you must do the editing work to produce a WG Note. > Will prepare it from publication. Done (pub rules checked, removed unused references, and fixed broken links). http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/pub/ Set the publication date for the 27th. Publish away :) -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 15:18:16 UTC