Re: [widgets] Proposal to publish Widget Requirements and Widget Landscape docs as Working Group Notes; deadline Sep 23 from Marcos Caceres on 2011-09-20 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:25:24 +0200
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D538AF4ECFB94066813FC83DDCC4B122@marcosc.com>

On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> PLH says that ideally every spec ends as a WG Note or a Recommendation 
> but in practice groups need to consider other factors. In the case of 
> the Landscape doc, which was by definition (or at least by title) 
> transient, so let's just drop it (and not publish it as a WG Note).
Agreed. 
> So, the proposal for the Landscape doc is amended: the proposal is to 
> formally stop working on the Landscape document and to move it to 
> PubStatus' "Specs NO Longer Active" table:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Specs_NO_Longer_Active
> 
> If anyone objects to that, please reply by September 23 and understand 
> that it would mean that you must do the editing work to produce a WG Note.
Will prepare it from publication.

Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 08:25:55 UTC