- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:02:23 -0700
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality >>> operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. >>> Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't implementable in Brainfuck >>> anyway as it doesn't have objects, so I'm ok with that. >>> >>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck >>> >> >> If a DOM implementation returns node-wrappers instead of exposing the actual nodes then you could end up with different node-refs for the same node. I'm not sure whether that violates other requirements of the spec. > > A similar method is present in the JS libs too, like jQuery. If it is necessary, is a Node.isSameType useful? I take it you mean "isSameNode", right? Do you have a pointer to the jQuery function? / Jonas
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 01:03:20 UTC