- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:00:16 -0700
- To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality >> operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. >> Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't implementable in Brainfuck >> anyway as it doesn't have objects, so I'm ok with that. >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck > > If a DOM implementation returns node-wrappers instead of exposing the > actual nodes then you could end up with different node-refs for the same > node. I'm not sure whether that violates other requirements of the spec. I would expect that to violate the DOM spec. I.e. I would say that if an implementation returned true for someNode.firstChild != someNode.firstChild then I would say that that that shouldn't be allowed by the DOM. / Jonas
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 01:01:23 UTC