- From: David Flanagan <dflanagan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:18:49 -0700
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 9/4/11 6:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:12:45 +0200, Arthur Barstow
> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> The CfC to publish a new WD of DOM Core was blocked by this RfC. I
>> will proceed with a request to publish a new WD of DOM Core in TR/.
>> The name DOM Core will be used for the upcoming WD. If anyone wants
>> to propose a name change, please start a *new* thread.
>
> Given that the specification replaces most of DOM2 and DOM3 I suggest
> we name it DOM4, including for the upcoming WD (or alternatively a WD
> we publish a couple of weeks later).
>
>
This is an editorial issue, and Anne is the editor. It should be his
perogative to name the spec he's put so much work into. Editing specs
is hard work; let's not create needless headaches for the editors.
Everyone has had a chance to make their suggestions, now let's just let
Anne publish his spec under whatever name he chooses. Its just a name!
David
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 16:19:20 UTC