- From: Jarred Nicholls <jarred@extjs.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:45:03 -0400
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 5, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 5, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: >>> On 9/4/11 6:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:12:45 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The CfC to publish a new WD of DOM Core was blocked by this RfC. I will >>> proceed with a request to publish a new WD of DOM Core in TR/. The name DOM >>> Core will be used for the upcoming WD. If anyone wants to propose a name >>> change, please start a *new* thread. >>> >>> Given that the specification replaces most of DOM2 and DOM3 I suggest we >>> name it DOM4, including for the upcoming WD (or alternatively a WD we >>> publish a couple of weeks later). >>> >>> I propose calling it "Web Core". >>> WC1 (Web Core version 1). >> >> WebCore is one of the major implementation components of WebKit. >> Calling this spec Web Core might be confusing for folks who work on >> WebKit. It would be somewhat like calling a spec Presto. :) > > Or calling a browser "Chrome". > > Web Core does implement web core, doesn't it? Among a lot of other things e.g. SVG canvas and various html5 things >>> >>> >
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 21:45:46 UTC