- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:32:19 -0400
- To: ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
Cyril - unless we hear otherwise from you, we will assume you are satisfied with the way your comments have been addressed: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/ Anne - assuming Cyril is agreeable with the way his comments were addressed, please update the ED to reflect a CR publication (e.g. add CR exit criteria you used in rev 1.25) and notify me when you are done so I can start a CfC to publish a CR. -Thanks, AB On 8/16/11 7:54 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:06:25 +0200, Cyril Concolato > <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: >> The sentence is so unreadable that it's hard to suggest something. It >> starts with a general statement but ends with an example. I think it >> should be split in two: general statement with a full sentence (now >> it seems to end at "letter" ?) and then add the example. Also add >> "to" before "prefix" and "start". > > Fair enough, I dropped it. Progress Events is so small anyway and the > specification it depends upon (DOM Core) already has clearer text on > extensibility. > > >>> There are no requirements. >> >> When reading that: "The editor is encouraged to define it in a way >> consistent with this", it did not seem so. > > Well there are no specific requirements. If other editors do it wrong > that will be pointed out, but since use can vary wildly I doubt that > will happen much. > > >>> Because it very much depends on the context. >> >> Example ? > > Cross-origin XMLHttpRequest versus same-origin XMLHttpRequest versus > the HTML application cache feature. > >
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 13:33:19 UTC