- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:49:19 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 8/30/11 4:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:57:59 +0200, Charles Pritchard > <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/2011 1:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Examples of such services would be useful here. (That would still >>> accept urlencoded files.) >> >> A URL encoded post; that it would use a blob as the source of one of >> the values is secondary. >> The idea is to improve the FormData interface, so that >> xhr.send(FormData) can support x-www-form-urlencoded quickly/easily. > > This is not an example of an existing service. > > Many services use form-urlencoded for form data, though not for files, and typically not for large strings. Google's Picasa uses multipart/related instead of multipart/form-data. I believe that Google App engine has a few areas where POST is used with x-www-form-urlencoded only. I'm not certain. Many RPC services expect POST + form-urlencoded. Again, I realize that you're looking for specific, existing services, citations. It's going to take me some time to put that together.
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 19:49:43 UTC