On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>wrote: > > Independent of our different point of view on control, shadow DOM needs > > debug APIs. So much the better if these are available to extensions. > > Let me see if I can capture this into a feature: user scripts may have > access to shadow DOM subtrees. In terms of WebKit, when run in user > script worlds, the Element has an extra accessor to spelunk down the > shadow DOM. > > Is this what you're suggesting? > Yes. Encapsulation is good UI, not security. I want to ignore the subtree "normally" but jump into the astral plane for special enlightenment. XUL has such a mechanism, but I'd wish for less mystery. I spent many hours trying to keep element inspection working on XUL. The API should aim to work well with code designed for normal elements. jjb > > :DG< > > > > > jjb > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 03:24:48 UTC