- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:23:39 -0700
- To: gkaur@gurpreetkaur.org
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:08 AM, <gkaur@gurpreetkaur.org> wrote: > My Suggestions for XMLHttpRequest Document Page... > > 1) W3C Editor's Draft (red vertical bar on the left)-> Draft is something > when you are putting things together. It's not a final product. It should be > renamed or removed. The editor's draft is not a final product. The spec is still evolving. > 2) This page is so long. I have to do so much scrolling. Don't need to > display links for Previous Versions on multiple lines. Just have one link - > open up a new page with previous versions links displayed. Sorry you find clicking and moving your mouse a few centimeters so strenuous. > 3) As a developer, I don't care what the "Status of this Document" is. All I > care about is what this object do. This section should be moved somewhere > else. Developers are not the only target audience for this document. The primary audience is implementers, who find such information important. > 4) Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria: I really don't understand this > section. Why do I need to know so much about the working group and their > work. This should be given to them not the public. As above. Developers are not the only audience: this important for other people/groups. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 17:24:26 UTC