- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:25:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 04:25:49 UTC
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Joćo Eiras wrote: > > While the idea is interesting, "create" is a too simple name to add on > something as polluted as Element. Why? I think create() is fine. It's a pretty common name for a factory or constructor (in languages with named constructors), and having it on the interface object makes it pretty clear what it's a factory for. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 04:25:49 UTC