W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [websockets] Making optional extensions mandatory in the API (was RE: Getting WebSockets API to Last Call)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107211613130.3775@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Given the Protocol is now in LC review, it seems relatively important to 
> align the API and Protocol.

The API and the protocal _are_ aligned. The protocol asks for the consumer 
to provide a list of extensions. Nothing in the protocol requires that 
this list of extensions be configurable by the consumer's user.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 16:15:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:23 UTC