- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:31:29 +0200
- To: "ext Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, "jonas@sicking.cc" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "simonp@opera.com" <simonp@opera.com>, "Brian Raymor" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, "Takeshi Yoshino" <tyoshino@google.com>, "Greg Wilkins" <gregw@intalio.com>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:26:21 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > What do others (Anne?, Maciej?, ...) think about this issue? I don't know enough about the WebSocket protocol, but optional web platform features suck. They will become mandatory following the typical "dominant implementation does it and we want to work on the same sites" scenario. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 15:32:28 UTC