W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Where to discuss TR process issues? [Was: Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:21:54 -0500
Cc: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AD329819-DBE2-4D17-858D-3F9EB0176384@w3.org>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>

On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Hi Hixie,
> On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be
>>> addressed before publishing a new LCWD?
>> Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the
>> prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous.
> I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I actually agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand them ;-)] and I think they should be discussed with a different set of people then WebApps.  For instance, the so-called Advisory Board [AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of the W3C Process Document", yet I suspect very few of them are subscribed to public-webapps.
> So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to another Public list.
> IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR process?

There is no list with a public archive. One thing to do is use process-issues and cc www-archive if you wish.


> -AB
> [AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/

Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 22:22:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:22 UTC