- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:41:53 -0400
- To: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Hi Hixie, On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be >> addressed before publishing a new LCWD? > Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the > prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous. I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I actually agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand them ;-)] and I think they should be discussed with a different set of people then WebApps. For instance, the so-called Advisory Board [AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of the W3C Process Document", yet I suspect very few of them are subscribed to public-webapps. So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to another Public list. IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR process? -AB [AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 19:42:15 UTC