Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)

On Sep 29, 2009, at 08:17 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2009, at 2:06 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2009, at 01:19 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>>> If at all possible I'd rather it went to LC ASAP, and if needed  
>>>> that new stuff be done in a branched document.
>>>
>>> Based on the conversation so far, I expect Web IDL in roughly its  
>>> current state would not survive Last Call.
>>
>> Which is fine, being grilled through LC is progress. I would just  
>> like to avoid piling up even more things that it needs to do.
>
> We're supposed to do our best to address likely objections before  
> Last Call.

Hence the "AP" part of "ASAP".

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 08:46:07 UTC