- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:48:42 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:41:38 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> I believe it is the idea that Web Sockets will support sending and >> receiving structured clones. It might make sense to define that format >> sooner rather than later so implementations of Web Storage that support >> structured clones can use it. > > HTML5 already defines which objects can be "strucurally cloned". This > is enough for webstorage. What remains to be defined if structured > clones can be sent over websocket is to define a serialized format. > However webstorage does not need such a serialized format as far as I > can tell. It does not need to expose it, but you do need to serialize to something as far as I can tell if you write it to disk. If the format for Web Sockets is clear maybe we have to only worry about the serialization of structured clones once. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:49:30 UTC