- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:33:16 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:50 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com> > wrote: >> On Aug 27, 2009, at 17:11 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> >>> I don't think the following two assertions are worth testing (and >>> should >>> not apply to the P&C UA). >>> >>> [[ >>> A user agent should expose custom icons in a way that it is >>> visible to the >>> end user. >>> ]] >>> >>> And... >>> >>> [[ >>> When the license element's href attribute is used, the user agent >>> should >>> provide end users the ability to view or otherwise link to the >>> referenced >>> license. >>> ]] >>> >>> I don't know if we should delete them, or move them to another spec. >> >> Both of those are UI-level conformance criteria. Maybe there >> should just be >> a UI product? > > Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. I agree those two assertions should not apply to a strict P+C UA. Creating a new conformance criteria for these requirements on a Widget runtime UA is one way to address these bugs. -Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 13:34:15 UTC