Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Michael Nordman<michaeln@google.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I think getAsURL() should become an attribute instead. E.g.
> >> >
> >> >  readonly attribute DOMString localURL;
> >> >
> >> > Since it is just a reference there is no need this needs to be
> >> > asynchronous and there is also no need for it to be method.
> >>
> >> Agreed.
> >
> > The draft says a new UUID should be 'coined' for each method invocation.
> > (Why is that?) Given the coinage of a new url on each access, accessing
> it
> > thru an attribute feels a little odd.
>
> I think we should removed that requirement though.


I'd be in favor of removing that requirement too.

(Unless there is an actual reason for it to start with? The draft was very
expicit about calling for a new guid on each access, i have no clue why.)


>
>
> / Jonas
>