Re: Points of order on this WG

The abstract still states:
[[
This specification defines two APIs for persistent data storage in Web  
clients: one for accessing key-value pair data and another for  
accessing structured data.
]]
Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com



On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:56 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> [...] (if anything, I think we should split Web Storage into two
>>> further specs [...]
>>
>> [...] I would prefer to see SQL Storage split out of the rest of Web
>> Storage. We seem to have rough consensus and strong multilateral
>> implementor interest on LocalStorage and SessionStorage, and they  
>> should
>> be allowed to move forward on the standards track quickly. SQL  
>> Storage
>> remains contentious, and only Apple and Google have shown strong
>> implementor interest so far. And it has no technical tie to the other
>> storage drafts.
>
> Done.
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
>
> I'll probably not ask for Web Database to go to last call in October
> (unlike the rest of the specs I'm working on), so that we can add  
> the SQL
> definition before last call (which I plan to do either Q4 this year or
> early next year).
>
> -- 
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                ) 
> \._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _ 
> \  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'-- 
> (,_..'`-.;.'
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 18:59:18 UTC