- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:23:59 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
2009/6/10 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>: > I don't really like the optional ITS behavior. Also, what is the effect of having it there? My understanding is that, in implementations, the appropriate unicode directionality markers would be inserted where the its elements and attributes appear. > If this is a feature needed by authors it also seems better for them if they have it without all the additional namespaces. > This is here because I18N community requested it, we added it, it's optional and has been marked as a "feature-at-risk" (as described and allowed in the process document). If no one implements it, then we will remove it. > textContent is an attribute, not a property. In bindings it might turn into a property, but that is not relevant I think. > Fixed. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 10:24:53 UTC